STATE OF SCNRFP Pages Scroll Down

STATE OF SCNRFP Pages Scroll DownSTATE OF SCNRFP Pages Scroll DownSTATE OF SCNRFP Pages Scroll DownSTATE OF SCNRFP Pages Scroll Down
  • Home Page
  • Global Mission 2026
  • Recognition Page 1
  • Recognition Page 2
  • ETMO Page
  • Executive Branch Page
  • Environmental Missions
  • NNIA Convention Page
  • Citizenship Page
  • Foreign Diplomatic Office
  • Talking Leaves Press Pg 1
  • Talking Leaves Press Pg 2
  • Talking Leaves Press Pg 3
  • Talking Leaves Press Pg 4
  • UN Peace Keeping Page
  • Marshal Service Page
  • Holocaust - Genocide Page

STATE OF SCNRFP Pages Scroll Down

STATE OF SCNRFP Pages Scroll DownSTATE OF SCNRFP Pages Scroll DownSTATE OF SCNRFP Pages Scroll Down
  • Home Page
  • Global Mission 2026
  • Recognition Page 1
  • Recognition Page 2
  • ETMO Page
  • Executive Branch Page
  • Environmental Missions
  • NNIA Convention Page
  • Citizenship Page
  • Foreign Diplomatic Office
  • Talking Leaves Press Pg 1
  • Talking Leaves Press Pg 2
  • Talking Leaves Press Pg 3
  • Talking Leaves Press Pg 4
  • UN Peace Keeping Page
  • Marshal Service Page
  • Holocaust - Genocide Page

NNIA TREATY - INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION

NNIA TREATY

We hold that signs, visions, dreams, and powers were all gifts of the spirits, and that their world was intertwined with and presided over by the spirit world.


The Vision of the NNIA Treaty was delivered to a Seer who is a member of the SCNRFP and the NNIA has been made available for all governments (tribal, theocracy, central government in a supporting position)  in a good way.


Headquartered with the Southern Cherokee Nation and The Red Fire People, State of SCNRFP Government, International Independent Recognized Sovereign Neutral Nation and State (Country)

 

Thousands of Tribal Nations Globally and Member Nations of UN, Representing Hundreds of Millions People Globally with the NNIA Convention formed by the NNIA Treaty


The NNIA issued a Headquarter Agreement by the State of SCNRFP within the State's Foreign Territories


Note: The date on the treaty itself shall remain the original date of 19th day of May, 2014, however, you will use the current date of signing under your signature on the signature page, for this is a multiple signer treaty.



Note: If you desire to become a signer on the NNIA, download the Native Nations Intergovernmental Alliance Treaty, thus the 2nd document attached below is the actual treaty to be signed and seal placed on the treaty or finger print for those who do not have a stamp seal, and include the complete details and overview of your nation, number of tribal members, details of your culture, traditions, law, any recognitions of your tribal government, and any treaties, and or agreements between the tribal government has with the central government, if any. Email your nation's complete package to the NNIA Convention for review and acceptance into the NNIA Convention to:

 scnrfp@stategov.services


NNIA Chief of Council 

Awaiting Appointment


Chief Usti 

Chief Minister General of the NNIA (Treaty)


See Attached NNIA Treaty


See NNIA Photo Gallery Below

Native Nations Intergovernmental Alliance Treaty 2026 (pdf)Download

Example only

Example Only.  Do not download and sign this document. The following PDF is not for use by others. SCNRFP Tribal Nation is also a signer and member of the NNIA Treaty.

Each Signer Must download the treaty listed above and  independently sign the NNIA Treaty shown above and provide to the NNIA Convention for review and final approval

EXAMPLE BELOW

NNIA

NNIA issued a Headquarter Agreement by the State of SCNRFP


Important Documents that lead to the NNIA Treaty:

Prophecies and Visions.


By 2010 a total of 137 Member Nations of the UN has signed the Declaration for Self-Determination.


The Declaration is decades in the making, starting in with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The UDHR is a declaration adopted by the United Nations 

General Assembly on 10 December 1948. 


Now comes the NNIA Treaty, a treaty of peace, good will, nation and community support and 

developing, trade and commerce, recognition and self-determination. 


The NNIA Treaty supports the nations in a good way with the continued mission of making 

available economic development, social needs, technologies, and humanitarian efforts. We are 

making available education, medical, food-agriculture, housing, technologies, legal, and self-sustainable industries, businesses and otherwise to support a strong community and nation…. 

Companies incorporated within the State of SCNRFP have shown their desire to support the 

efforts of the NNIA and the State of SCNRFP state-owned (government) companies supports the NNIA with providing the NNIA with the needed technologies, systems, services, products and 

monetary support.

Find out more

Headquarter Agreement

Headquarters agreements govern the relationship between an international organization such as the UN and the host state where the headquarters of the international organization are located. Included in a typical agreement are provisions related to the status, privileges and immunities, and activities of an international organization.


The NNIA Treaty/Convention, is an Intergovernmental Alliance, thus a IGO International Organization has a Headquarters agreement with the State of SCNRFP.  


In the case of the UN, there are a number of headquarters agreements as a number of UN funds, programmes, specialized agencies, secretariats and tribunals have offices based in locations around the world. These agreements can be found in the UN Treaty Series.


The UN-US Headquarters Agreement (11 UNTS 11) is the biggest and best known headquarters agreement as the UN complex in New York is considered the principal headquarters of the United Nations. 


HEADQUARTERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 


Headquarters Agreement between the International Criminal. Court and the Host State. ICC-BD/04-01-08.


EUCLID has signed two headquarters agreements that are legally in force and in operation. The initial agreement with the Central African Republic (2011) and a new agreement was signed with the Republic of The Gambia in 2013 due to instability and operational challenges in Bangui. In addition, the EUCLID treaty did provide for a temporary headquarters office in Brussels, Belgium (without specific status), and EUCLID maintains a Liaison Office in Washington DC which likewise is an executive office with no special legal status.

Find out more

OAS adopts new Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

June 15, 2016

(SANTO DOMINGO, Dominican Republic) — Today, after nearly 30 years, the Organization of American States (OAS) adopted the American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. 


“This is a profound moment in the history of the indigenous rights movement,” said Armstrong Wiggins, director of the Indian Law Resource Center’s Washington, D.C. office. 


For generations, indigenous peoples’ human rights, including their right of self-determination and their rights to their lands, territories, environment, natural resources, sustainable development, and cultural survival have been challenged globally. The American Declaration offers specific protection for indigenous peoples in North America, Mexico, Central and South America, and the Caribbean.


“No declaration is perfect, but this is an important step in the right direction to protect indigenous peoples,” said Wiggins.  “The American Declaration, as a human rights instrument, is a living instrument that will be interpreted in accordance with indigenous peoples’ present-day conditions, in order to better protect their human rights.”


 From left to right: Paulo Celso de Oliveira, Brazil; Hector Huertas Gonzalez , Panama;  Clem Chartier-Canada; and Armstrong Wiggins, director of ILRC Washington, D.C. office.The American Declaration will provide thorough protections for indigenous women and children, for indigenous peoples living in voluntary isolation, and for those affected by a state’s internal armed conflict.


The OAS is a regional intergovernmental organization of 35 member countries of the Americas, including the United States.  The OAS General Assembly – the highest body of the OAS – took its first steps toward a declaration in 1989, but it wasn’t until 1999, when the Working Group on the draft American Declaration was established, that indigenous peoples were allowed to participate in the meetings and negotiations on the content of the Declaration.  


“We are glad a number of indigenous participants were able to secure funds and attend the negotiations throughout the lengthy process. They succeeded in overcoming great problems in a somewhat flawed system to win approval of a good text of the Declaration,” said Wiggins.


The American Declaration will become one of the most important instruments of the Inter-American Human Rights System. Both the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights will interpret the Declaration to provide content to other instruments, such as the American Convention on Human Rights – the main regional human rights treaty, and the American Declaration on Rights and Duties of Man.  This is particularly important when indigenous peoples are seeking recognition of treaty and land rights, protections for those in voluntary isolation or under internal armed conflicts, and protections for indigenous women and children. 


Looking forward, Wiggins hopes the Declaration will guide the OAS to undertake action-oriented programs to help indigenous peoples realize the rights recognized in the Declaration.  “This is the beginning of another journey, where indigenous peoples from the Americas expect the OAS and its member states to take actions, in conjunction with our traditional governments and authorities, to ensure full enjoyment of our collective rights.”


 Indian Law Resource Center staff have participated in all of the negotiations to provide legal advice and support to the indigenous representatives.



Find out more

The declaration is the first instrument in the history of the OAS to promote and protect the rights

Feature

A 17-Year Wait Pays off for Indigenous Peoples 

Adopts American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

50 Million People in the Americas Self-Define as Indigenous.

June 15, 2016


When Héctor Huertas attended the first meeting to draft an American declaration on indigenous peoples in 1999, he thought the end was not far off. Neither he, nor anyone else in that room in Washington, D.C., imagined that the end was 17 years away.


That train finally reached its destination today at the General Assembly of the Organization of American States in Santo Domingo, where the member states adopted the American Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples by acclamation.


The declaration is the first instrument in the history of the OAS to promote and protect the rights of the indigenous peoples of the Americas.


Huertas, a Panamanian lawyer and indigenous leader who belongs to the Guna people, took part not only in the inaugural meeting, but in the entire process that lasted the best part of two decades. Hence his visible satisfaction as he stood up today to address the General Assembly following the Declaration’s adoption. “Today the OAS is honoring an historical debt to indigenous peoples by acknowledging the rights of the more than 50 million indigenous men, women, and children who live in the Americas,” he said.



“The OAS has honored an historical debt to indigenous peoples from Alaska to Tierra del Fuego.”


Huertas stressed that the Declaration introduces a new framework for relations between states and indigenous peoples, including greater respect for their human rights and their consideration on topics such as sustainable development.


The Declaration also makes profound changes within states that paves the way for genuine democracy and participation for indigenous peoples in each state. It recognizes the rights to self-determination, land, resources, and, above all, free and informed prior consent,” he said.


“The OAS is ushering a new phase in relations with an instrument that could give indigenous peoples a say in all aspects of development in the Hemisphere. We are even going to ask the OAS to let us participate as indigenous peoples and not as civil society,” Huertas added.


“Historic Milestone for the Americas”

“The Declaration recognizes our right to self-determination.”


Adelfo Regino Montes, an indigenous Mexican lawyer from the Mixe people of Oaxaca, was also in Santo Domingo, where this “historic milestone for the Americas,” as he put it, was reached.


Regino Montes said that the Declaration represents a stride forward in terms of both individual and collective rights as it recognizes fundamental rights, including “self-determination and autonomy and land rights, which is very important because in countries like Mexico and Brazil the forests have been preserved thanks to the indigenous peoples.”


The representative of the Mixe people considered it valuable that the Declaration includes the issue of “free, prior consent,” which compels states to inform indigenous peoples about infrastructure and development projects before they start. “It is important that the Declaration recognizes that the indigenous people who may be affected must be consulted before any administrative or legislative steps are taken. Unfortunately, in the past our peoples have had to suffer having projects imposed on them,” he added.

 

The Declaration recognizes:

The collective organization and multicultural and multilingual character of indigenous peoples.

The self-identification of people who consider themselves indigenous.

Special protection for peoples in voluntary isolation or initial contact, such as certain peoples of the Amazon, which is an aspect that distinguishes it from other similar initiatives.

That progress in promoting and effectively protecting the rights of the indigenous peoples of the Americas is a priority for the OAS.


Collective rights

Foreign Minister of Bolivia (first from the left): “We celebrate the fact that in the Dominican Republic the OAS Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples was adopted.”


The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Bolivia, David Choquehuanca, emphasized that the Declaration recognizes “all rights: not only human rights—which are individual—but also collective rights, such as economic, social, and cultural rights.” “We therefore applaud the adoption here in the Dominican Republic of this Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples of the Organization of American States,” Foreign Minister Choquehuanca added.


Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Nicaragua, and Peru celebrated the adoption of the Declaration in the plenary of the Assembly. Juan Gabriel Morales, Mexico’s Deputy Director General for Hemispheric and Security Affairs, described it as the “first hemispheric document that seeks to promote and protect the rights of the indigenous peoples of the Americas and, along with the United Nations Declaration, it is a basic instrument for the survival, dignity, and wellbeing of the indigenous peoples of our hemisphere.” Mexico’s representative continued: “The Declaration emphasizes the recognition of and respect for the rights of indigenous peoples to collective action and to their own legal, social, political, and economic systems or institutions.”


The Deputy Foreign Minister of Nicaragua, Denis Moncada, said that the adoption of the Declaration was the “historical vindication of the indigenous peoples of the Americas, who have suffered the consequences of colonialism and neocolonialism and, with that, the extermination of their populations, segregation, exclusion, and the loss of their natural habitat. ... We cannot deny the important contribution made by the indigenous people of the Americas to the multicultural and multilingual richness of our societies.”


Since the 1970s, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights has maintained that for historical reasons and moral and humanitarian principles, states have a sacred commitment to provide indigenous peoples with special protection. In 1990, the Commission created the Office of the Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples to attend to those peoples that are particularly exposed to human rights violations on account of their vulnerable situations and to strengthen the Commission's work in that area.


Key points of the Declaration:

Self-identification as indigenous peoples will be a fundamental criterion for determining to whom the Declaration applies.

Indigenous peoples have the right to self-determination.

Gender equality: indigenous women have collective rights that are indispensable for their existence, wellbeing, and comprehensive development as peoples.

Indigenous persons and communities have the right to belong to one or more indigenous peoples, in accordance with the identity, traditions, and customs of belonging of each people.

States shall recognize fully their juridical personality, respecting their forms of organization and promoting the full exercise of the rights recognized in the Declaration.

They have the right to maintain, express, and freely develop their cultural identity.

They have the right to not be subjected to any form of genocide.

They have the right not to be subject to racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, or other related forms of intolerance.

They have the right to their own cultural identity and integrity and to their cultural heritage.

They have the right to autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal affairs.

Indigenous peoples in voluntary isolation or initial contact have the right to remain in that condition and to live freely and in accordance with their cultures.

They have the rights and guarantees recognized in national and international labor law.

They have the right to the lands, territories, and resources that they have traditionally owned, occupied, used, or acquired.

Find out more

NNIA

    Building Stronger Communities: Our Government Services in Pictures

    TRIBUTE

      Honoring dragging canoe

      Honoring Dragging Canoe

       Dragging Canoe (c. 1738–1792) was a prominent Cherokee war chief who led a militant faction known as the Chickamauga Cherokee from 1777 until his death. Opposing the encroachment of American settlers and the 1775 Treaty of Sycamore Shoals, he established independent, militant towns near Chickamauga, TN. He maintained armed resistance against American expansion, allying with the British during the American Revolution. Key details regarding Dragging Canoe's life and resistance:

      • Resistance Movement: Formed the Chickamauga Cherokee to oppose the surrender of land, conducting raids on settlers in Tennessee and the surrounding region.
      • Alliances: Aligned with the British, Shawnee, and Muskogee against American settlers.
      • Death: Died of natural causes (often cited as heart attack/exhaustion) on February 29, 1792, after celebrating new alliances.
      • Legacy: His resistance continued for nearly two decades, with his followers continuing to fight after his death. 

      Note: The assertion that the split ended in a "peaceful reunification council in 1809" is not supported by the search results, which indicate he died in 1792 and his, and his followers' resistance lasted for years after.  


       Dragging Canoe was a formidable war chief who led the Chickamauga Cherokee (or "Lower Cherokee") in a relentless campaign of armed resistance against American expansion from 1777 until his death in 1792. Following his death, his successor John Watts continued this militant path until a formal peace was established in 1794. The period of political fragmentation between the militant Chickamauga and the more accommodationist "Upper Towns" eventually concluded with a significant reunification council in 1809. Key facts about the 1809 reunification and its aftermath:

      • End of the Separation: The 1809 council officially ended "the separation," a term the Cherokee used for the period after 1776 when the Chickamauga lived independently from other bands.
      • Rise of New Leadership: The reunification paved the way for a younger "Cherokee Triumvirate"—James Vann, Major Ridge, and Charles R. Hicks—who advocated for centralized government and rapid acculturation.
      • Continued Pressure: Despite the internal unity achieved in 1809, external pressure intensified. That same year, some Lower Town leaders like Stone Carrier proposed ceding lands in exchange for territory in the West, signaling the early roots of the eventual Trail of Tears.
      • Capital and Sovereignty: This renewed unity eventually led to the 1827 Constitution and the establishment of New Echota as the national capital. 

      Honoring Jimmy Moli Steven

      Honoring Jimmy Moli Stevens (c. 1916–1994)

       Jimmy Moli Stevens (c. 1916–1994), also known as "Moses," was a ni-Vanuatu leader who founded the custom-based Nagriamel movement on Espiritu Santo island, advocating for customary land rights against colonial land alienation. In 1980, he led a failed secessionist rebellion known as the "Coconut War" against the incoming independent government, establishing the short-lived "State of Vemerana" with support from French settlers and the US-based Phoenix Foundation. Key details about Chief Jimmy Stevens:

      • The Movement: As head of the Nagriamel movement, he unified "dark bush people" in the interior of Santo to promote traditional kastom and resist foreign ownership of land.
      • 1980 Rebellion: Shortly before Vanuatu's independence on July 30, 1980, Stevens declared the independence of Espiritu Santo. The revolt, often termed the "Coconut War," was backed by French planters and the Phoenix Foundation.
      • Downfall: The rebellion was suppressed by Papua New Guinea troops in August 1980, and Stevens was arrested.
      • Imprisonment: He was sentenced to 14 years in prison in November 1980 for inciting rebellion, which included charges of possessing arms. He was released in 1991.
      • Legacy: Stevens remains a controversial figure in Vanuatu, seen by some as a defender of land rights and indigenous culture, and by others as a separatist who threatened national unity. 


       "Chief Stevens" refers to Jimmy Stevens (c. 1916–1994), a charismatic and controversial ni-Vanuatu leader of the Nagriamel movement on the island of Espiritu Santo. He is best known for leading a failed secession attempt during Vanuatu's independence in 1980. Key Facts About Jimmy Stevens

      • Nagriamel Movement: In the 1960s, Stevens founded Nagriamel, a traditionalist political and social movement focused on protecting customary land rights from European settlers and promoting "kastom" (indigenous tradition).
      • The Coconut War: In June 1980, as the New Hebrides prepared for independence from Britain and France, Stevens declared the island of Espiritu Santo independent as the "State of Vemerana".
      • External Support: Stevens received significant backing from the Phoenix Foundation, an American libertarian group seeking to establish a tax haven, and some French landowners.
      • Imprisonment: The rebellion was suppressed by troops from Papua New Guinea (PNG). Stevens was arrested in August 1980 and sentenced to 14 years in prison for treason and inciting rebellion.
      • Legacy and Death: He was released in 1991 and died of stomach cancer in 1994 in Fanafo, his home village on Espiritu Santo. 

      Cultural and Family Context

      • Ancestry: Stevens was of mixed heritage, with Scottish, Tongan, and ni-Vanuatu descent.
      • Family: Known for his large family, he reportedly had 23 wives and fathered more than 40 children.
      • Recent Reconciliation: In April 2025, a historical reconciliation ceremony was held in Port Vila between the family of Jimmy Stevens and the PNG community to move past the grievances of the 1980 rebellion.


       The State of Vemerana (or Vemarana) was a short-lived, unrecognized secessionist state on the island of Espiritu Santo in the New Hebrides (now Vanuatu), proclaimed on May 28, 1980, during the "Coconut War". Led by Jimmy Stevens and supported by the Nagriamel movement, it was backed by foreign interests seeking a tax haven. 

      • Context: The secession occurred just before Vanuatu's independence from Britain and France (July 30, 1980).
      • Leadership: Jimmy Stevens declared himself "prime minister," with French Ambassador Philippe Allonneau named "King of Vemerana" by local chiefs.
      • Conflict: Known as the "Coconut War," the conflict involved the blockade of Santo-Pekoa International Airport and destruction of bridges.
      • Suppression: The rebellion was suppressed in August 1980 by troops from Papua New Guinea, requested by the new Vanuatu government led by Father Walter Lini.
      • Outcome: Jimmy Stevens was imprisoned until 1991, and Espiritu Santo remained part of Vanuatu. 


       The State of Vemerana (also known as the Republic of Vemerana) was a short-lived, unrecognized secessionist state declared on the island of Espiritu Santo in June 1980. Its attempt to break away from the soon-to-be independent nation of Vanuatu (then the New Hebrides) led to the brief and largely bloodless conflict known as the Coconut War. Key Facts

      • Leader: The movement was led by Jimmy Stevens (also known as "Moses"), head of the Nagriamel movement.
      • Timeline: It was proclaimed on May 28, 1980, just months before Vanuatu's planned independence from British and French rule. The rebellion was suppressed by August 31, 1980.
      • External Backing: The secession was supported by the Phoenix Foundation, an American libertarian group seeking to establish a tax-free haven, as well as some French business interests.
      • The "Coconut War": Rebels blockaded the airport and occupied government buildings. The newly formed Vanuatu government, led by Father Walter Lini, requested military aid from Papua New Guinea, whose "Kumul Force" quickly quelled the revolt.
      • Outcome: Jimmy Stevens was convicted and sentenced to 14 years in prison. Espiritu Santo remains an integral part of Vanuatu as its largest island. 

      Symbols of Vemerana

      • Capital: Luganville was renamed Allonneaupolis during the secession.
      • Flag: A light blue field with a green star.
      • Currency: The movement reportedly issued its own gold coins and passports during its brief existence.

      Honoring Russell Means

      Honoring Russell Means

       Russell Means (1939–2012) was a prominent Oglala Lakota activist, actor, and writer. Widely considered one of the most influential Indigenous leaders of the 20th century, he is primarily known for his leadership in the American Indian Movement (AIM) and his efforts to bring global attention to the mistreatment of Native peoples. Key Life & Activism

      • American Indian Movement (AIM): Joining in 1968, Means became AIM's first national director in 1970. He led high-profile protests, including the 1970 seizure of the Mayflower II replica, the 1971 occupation of Mount Rushmore, and the 1972 "Trail of Broken Treaties" occupation of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.
      • Wounded Knee Standoff: In 1973, he was a central figure in the 71-day armed standoff with federal agents at Wounded Knee, South Dakota, to protest government policies and corruption.
      • Political Pursuits: Means was a vocal Libertarian, running for the U.S. presidential nomination in 1988 (finishing second to Ron Paul) and the governorship of New Mexico in 2001.
      • Republic of Lakotah: In 2007, he led a group in declaring the Republic of Lakotah an independent nation, seeking to withdraw from all treaties with the U.S. government. 


      Acting and LegacyIn 1992, Means launched a successful acting career to bring Native American representation to Hollywood. 

      • Film: His most famous role was Chingachgook in The Last of the Mohicans (1992). He also appeared in Natural Born Killers (1994) and voiced Chief Powhatan in Disney's Pocahontas (1995).
      • Writings: He published his autobiography, Where White Men Fear to Tread, in 1995.
      • Cultural Philosophy: He famously preferred the term "American Indian" over "Native American," arguing that anyone born in America is a "native American" while "Indian" is the legal term used in treaties. 


      Means died of esophageal cancer on October 22, 2012, at his ranch in Porcupine, South Dakota. His ashes were scattered in the Black Hills, a site sacred to the Lakota. 


       In 2007, prominent Oglala Lakota activist Russell Means and the Lakota Freedom Movement declared independence from the United States, proposing the "Republic of Lakotah" as a sovereign nation. This proposed nation aimed to cover thousands of square miles in North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wyoming, and Montana, based on the 1851 Treaty of Fort Laramie. Key Details of the Republic of Lakotah Proposal:

      • Founder: Russell Means, a longtime activist with the American Indian Movement (AIM).
      • Goal: To establish an independent country for the Lakota people, arguing that treaties with the U.S. government were consistently violated.
      • Territory: The proposed area included parts of five states, encompassing existing Indian reservations and non-Native lands.
      • Support & Reception: The initiative was not supported or consulted by the established, recognized Lakota tribal governments.
      • Context: Means frequently described the U.S. reservation system as a form of "concentration camp" and advocated for full sovereignty, which led to the declaration. 


      Although the Republic of Lakotah did not gain official recognition or establish functional sovereignty, it highlighted long-standing issues of treaty rights and Lakota autonomy. Russell Means continued to advocate for indigenous rights until his death in 2012.  

      Copyright © 2018 State of SCNRFP Site and Added Copyright © 2021 AG State of SCNRFP Site Diplomatic Office ATG (2016) - All Rights Reserved.  

      Red Fire

      Los Gentes en (or in) Dios , meaning “the people in God.”

       We Follow the "White Path of Righteousness" 

      The State of scnrfp uses ai on this site


      Powered by

      This website uses cookies.

      We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

      Accept